When
you stand in front of fitting room mirrors at your
favorite clothing store, you get a 360° perspective
about your "look." You receive visual feedback from all
sides and can readily see if what you're trying on is a
good fit.
Much like
that fitting room mirror, a job related view of a key
employee from all angles can be valuable. Such a view
can be accomplished with a multi-rater, 360° feedback
review.
There's
understanding to be gained by managers when feed back
comes from supervisors, direct reports, and peers, each
giving a view of management skills and competencies from
their own unique perspective. Unlike a mirror, which
tells the truth (and nothing but the truth) a 360°
assessment has the potential of biased feedback.
To
minimize the potential for bias, the individual
administering the assessment should provide the
framework for productive use of the evaluation. The
administrator must insure that participants understand
the importance of providing honest evaluations. They
must promise and deliver the protection of anonymity.
Participants must understand a 360 evaluation is not a
time for paybacks and vendettas! They must feel they are
affecting and supporting the development of a
productive, employee focused company culture.
The
assessment instrument structure, like that of a form
fitting garment, is also critical. What should a
comprehensive 360° evaluation measure? It should present
a balanced picture of both the individual's strengths
and areas of opportunity for improvement. It should
provide an opportunity for people to see themselves and
their competencies as others view them.
In a well
constructed 360° assessment, evaluation is not based on
personality. Participants rate skills and behaviors
based on actual performance to enhance the performance
of the entire team. A good 360° process, which includes
an effective developmental plan for the manager, can
lead to better team cohesion and performance and better
retention of good employees. Some key competencies
include:
·
Communication
·
Leadership
·
Adaptability
·
Task
management
·
Production
·
Developing
others
·
Personal
development
·
Relationships
For
example, the competency of “Leadership” could include
measurement of how well the individual instills trust,
provides direction, and delegates responsibility.
With
Internet based assessment tools, the administration of a
360° is vastly simplified. Web based administration
allows tracking of assessment completion, while
maintaining anonymity of participants. A Web based
instrument also saves time, providing quick analysis of
the outcomes.
The
objectives of a 360°
evaluation are to provide a "mirror" for the manager and
his supervisor: a view of skills and behaviors from a
well rounded set of perspectives, providing the
framework for developing action plans for self
improvement.
Finally,
significant improvement of management can not be
accomplished with a one shot approach. Repeating cycles
of assessment, intervention, and reassessment are the
key to long term gains.